Home Decisions

Decision 107/2026

Decision 107/2026:  Traffic Regulation Order – failure to respond

  
Authority: Dundee City Council 
Case Ref: 202600495
 

Summary

The Applicant asked the Authority for information about Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) concerning a named street in Dundee.  This decision finds that the Authority failed to respond to the request and requirement for review within the timescale allowed by the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) and the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 (the EIRs).

Background

  1. The Applicant made an information request to the Authority on 19 December 2025. 
  2. The Authority did not respond to the information request.
  3. On 29 January 2026, the Applicant wrote to the Authority requiring a review in respect of its failure to respond.
  4. The Applicant did not receive a response to their requirement for review.
  5. The Applicant wrote to the Commissioner, stating that they were dissatisfied with the Authority’s failure to respond and applying to the Commissioner for a decision in terms of section 47(1) of FOISA.  The enforcement provisions of FOISA apply to the enforcement of the EIRs, subject to specified modifications – see regulation 17.
  6. The Commissioner determined that the application complied with section 47(2) of FOISA and that he had the power to carry out an investigation. 

Investigation

  1. Section 49(3)(a) of FOISA requires the Commissioner to notify public authorities of an application and to give them an opportunity to comment. The Commissioner did this on 21 April 2026. 
  2. The Authority acknowledged that it failed to meet both statutory deadlines of 20 working days for responding to the original request and the requirement for review. 
  3. It commented that this request formed part of a series of requests submitted by the Applicant and collectively the requests were both extensive in scope and complexity and involved a significant degree of overlap with information that had already been disclosed, or questions that had already been responded to.
  4. The Authority stated that, given the breadth and complexity of the request, the mechanisms available in regulation 7 of the EIRs (to extend the statutory timescale for responding to the request) or regulation 8 (charging for environmental information) would have been appropriate in this case, and these provisions should have been applied earlier. It accepted that this did not occur.
  5. It is apparent from the terms of the request that at least some of the information caught by it will be environmental information as defined by regulation 2(1) of the EIRs.  In Decision 218/2007 Transport Scotland,  the Commissioner confirmed at paragraph 51 that where environmental information is concerned, there are two separate statutory frameworks for access to that information and, in terms of the legislation, an authority is required to consider the request under both FOISA and EIRs.
  6. Section 10(1) of FOISA gives Scottish public authorities a maximum of 20 working days following the date of receipt of the request to comply with a request for information.  This is subject to qualifications which are not relevant in this case.  The same timescale is laid down by regulation 5(2)(a) of the EIRs.
  7. It is a matter of fact that the Authority did not provide a response to the Applicant’s request for information within 20 working days, so the Commissioner finds that it failed to comply with section 10(1) of FOISA and regulation 5(2)(a) of the EIRs.
  8. Section 21(1) of FOISA gives Scottish public authorities a maximum of 20 working days following the date of receipt of the requirement to comply with a requirement for review.  Again, this is subject to qualifications which are not relevant in this case.  The same timescale is laid down by regulation 16(4) of the EIRs.
  9. It is a matter of fact that the Authority did not provide a response to the Applicant’s requirement for review within 20 working days, so the Commissioner finds that it failed to comply with section 21(1) of FOISA and regulation 16(4) of the EIRs.
  10. The remainder of section 21 and regulation 16 sets out the requirements to be followed by a Scottish public authority in carrying out a review.  As no review has been carried out in this case, the Commissioner finds that the Authority failed to discharge these requirements: he now requires a review to be carried out in accordance with section 21/regulation 16.
  11. The Commissioner recommends that the Authority considers whether it would be appropriate to apologise to the Applicant for its failure to comply.

Decision 

The Commissioner finds that the Authority failed to comply with Part 1 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) and with the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 (the EIRs) in dealing with the information request made by the Applicant.  In particular, the Authority failed to respond to the Applicant’s request for information and requirement for review within the timescales laid down by sections 10(1) and 21(1) of FOISA and regulations 5(2) and 16(4) of the EIRs. 

The Commissioner requires the Authority to respond to the Applicant’s requirement for review by 29 June 2026. 

Appeal

Should either the Applicant or the Authority wish to appeal against this decision, they have the right to appeal to the Court of Session on a point of law only.  Any such appeal must be made within 42 days after the date of intimation of this decision.

Enforcement 

If the Authority fails to comply with this decision, the Commissioner has the right to certify to the Court of Session that the Authority has failed to comply.  The Court has the right to inquire into the matter and may deal with the Authority as if it had committed a contempt of court.

 

Jennifer Ross

Deputy Head of Enforcement 


13 May 2026

  1. ^